Re: Resolutions concerning dunc-tank
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Third resolution `We do not want to state an opinion':
> -8<-
> 1. The Developers note the existence and activities
> of the dunc-tanc project.
>
> 2. We do not believe it appropriate for the Project as a whole to
> address dunc-tank in a General Resolution.
> ->8-
So, if this resolution wins the vote, it will contradict itself since
we will have had a GR on Dunc yet we find it not appropriate to
have one?
--
Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
Reply to: