Re: Resolutions concerning dunc-tank
Loïc Minier <email@example.com> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Third resolution `We do not want to state an opinion':
>> 1. The Developers note the existence and activities
>> of the dunc-tanc project.
>> 2. We do not believe it appropriate for the Project as a whole to
>> address dunc-tank in a General Resolution.
> So, if this resolution wins the vote, it will contradict itself since
> we will have had a GR on Dunc yet we find it not appropriate to
> have one?
It's the "Ian should never have proposed this in the first place, but
since he did, there's no way in hell I'm going to vote for more discussion
since that's the last thing we need" option.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>