Re: Resolutions concerning dunc-tank
Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Third resolution `We do not want to state an opinion':
>> 1. The Developers note the existence and activities
>> of the dunc-tanc project.
>> 2. We do not believe it appropriate for the Project as a whole to
>> address dunc-tank in a General Resolution.
> So, if this resolution wins the vote, it will contradict itself since
> we will have had a GR on Dunc yet we find it not appropriate to
> have one?
Technically it's not a contradiction: DDs can vote to behave
inappropriately. :-) Still, it's poor wording. I suggest the following
amendment to Ian:
Replace clause 2 of third resolution with:
2. The Project as a whole chooses not to express any further opinion on
dunc-tank at this time. This constitutes neither approval nor
Nathanael Nerode <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud of it.
So why isn't he in prison yet?...