On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 02:48:36PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote: > On Saturday 19 February 2005 02:30 pm, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > Branden's implication on IRC was that he had already paid it when he > > got the note from your mother, and that you had already said Huzzah! > > when your mother sent the reminder, suggesting that you and she don't > > communicate very well about business. > In any case, my beef is that he is publicly talking about the incompetence of > my organization for totally unsubstantiated reasons. > <Overfiend> So apparently even Ean and his mother don't practice the sort of > vaunted levels of communication that Ean vowed to bring to SPI. Er, so the only alternatives here are "practicing the sort of vaunted levels of communication that [you] vowed to bring to SPI" and "organizational incompetence"? I would have suspected your black-and-white existence to be rather bleak, but clearly you find ample cause for excitement... Or perhaps you're referring to some accusation of incompetence that *wasn't* quoted in your message to debian-vote? Something less balanced and defensible than Branden expressing irritation at being called (in his words) an "ungrateful bastard"? > That's bad behavior. Pot, meet the kettle. You accuse him of "publicly" talking about Brainfood incompetence, when for most people on this list, *your post* made his comments far more public than Branden himself did. Oh, and I'm sure your mom is also sure to appreciate what your post has done for the results of a google search on her name. This all seems a rather contrived justification for posting such a bewilderingly off-topic message to debian-vote about someone who hasn't even nominated himself as a candidate. I agree with Thomas: your post says much more about you than it does about Branden. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature