Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
* Buddha Buck (firstname.lastname@example.org) [040428 16:55]:
> Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> >Good for you. But admit that some people disagree, at least.
> >Perhaps next time the subject of the CFV could make no comment on the
> >proposal at all. Call it "SC changes", rather than "SC editorial
> >changes". The secretary's opinion is irrelevant to the project so please
> >leave it out of the CFV.
> I don't like Manoj's tone in this thread.
There are a lot of things I don't like in this thread. I think it's
really best to get away from trying to make personal accusations. The
outcome of the GR is more or less for most of us the worst possible,
and we all should try to learn from this for future, even if a lot of
us are very much frustrated right now.
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C