Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:15:48 +1000, Hamish Moffatt <email@example.com> said:
>> > Of course you're right and everybody should have read the GR that
>> > you did indeed send to d-d-a three times. However you must
>> > concede that some people ignored the issue based on the subject
>> > of the CFV message alone, and that some people believe the
>> > subject of that message was misleading.
>> People can think a lot of things, and I have no control over their
>> opinion. I can only see things from my viewpoint, lacking
>> telepathy; and the topic was, and is, valid from where I stand.
> Good for you. But admit that some people disagree, at least.
Some People usually disagree with almost any statement of
substance on can make.
> Perhaps next time the subject of the CFV could make no comment on
> the proposal at all. Call it "SC changes", rather than "SC editorial
> changes". The secretary's opinion is irrelevant to the project so
> please leave it out of the CFV.
Again, you should do more research. The title of the GR was
proposed by the proposer: debian-vote, 22 Feb 2004, on GR status
I saw no reason to change what the proposer suggested as the
title, and no one, including you, objected.
I'm sorry, I just think you are quibbling in hid sight because
you do not like the vote results.
If people do not like the title selected by the proposer, they should
speak up _before_ the fact; and suggest alternatiuves, and not rail
against the secretary and, without proof, accuse him of substituting
his opinion in the GR title.
The most disagreeable thing that your worst enemy says to your face
does not approach what your best friends say behind your back. Alfred
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C