Re: Proposal - Deferment of Changes from GR 2004-003
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:08:39 +0200, Xavier Roche <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 03:28:33 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> In order to be counted, seconds have to be signed.
> Sorry, my gpg signature wasn't sent apparently.
> I also second the Steve Langasek's proposal, with Duncan Findlay's
Umm. I'm confused. These are two distinct options. Did you
mean to second Steve Langasek's proposal? Or Duncan Findlay's
amendment.? Or both?
A log may float in a river, but that does not make it a crocodile.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C