Re: Q: guidelines for post-campaign period?

[tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)]

Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> writes:

> > 	A long campaigning period still does not result in perfect
> >  information. Given that I have to make a decision in the face of
> >  incomplete information, the possibility of getting relevant
> >  information ought not to be dismissed.
> 
> In that case I wonder why no rebuttals were posted and why the IRC
> debate was called off, if obviously there is more need for information
> and discussion.

Manoj did not say that there is "obviously more need".  He just said
that one shouldn't dismiss the possibility of getting more relevant
information.

Nor was Manoj the one who called off the IRC debate.