Re: Q: guidelines for post-campaign period?
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 02:51:42PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 12:29:28PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > A long campaigning period still does not result in perfect
> > > information. Given that I have to make a decision in the face of
> > > incomplete information, the possibility of getting relevant
> > > information ought not to be dismissed.
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 07:59:48PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > In that case I wonder why no rebuttals were posted and why the IRC
> > debate was called off, if obviously there is more need for information
> > and discussion.
>
> Judgement call?
>
> Maybe those judgement calls could have been better, but "we've got plenty
> of campaign information on debian-vote, we don't need to add another
> forum" is not at all equivalent to "let's stop using debian-vote for
> this kind of traffic".
Anyway, I don't want to imply that I'm unhappy with the current process
or even Manoj. I was just pointing out my opinion. If others think it's
worthy to keep on going, that's fine with me.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
mbanck@debian.org
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
Reply to: