Re: Q: guidelines for post-campaign period?
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 12:29:28PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > A long campaigning period still does not result in perfect
> > information. Given that I have to make a decision in the face of
> > incomplete information, the possibility of getting relevant
> > information ought not to be dismissed.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 07:59:48PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> In that case I wonder why no rebuttals were posted and why the IRC
> debate was called off, if obviously there is more need for information
> and discussion.
Judgement call?
Maybe those judgement calls could have been better, but "we've got plenty
of campaign information on debian-vote, we don't need to add another
forum" is not at all equivalent to "let's stop using debian-vote for
this kind of traffic".
--
Raul
Reply to: