Re: non-free and users?

["Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>]

Raul Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 07:58:05PM +0100, Sergey V. Spiridonov wrote:
>
> > Are bad consequences which you take in account the same as what I 
> > describe? If not, can you please describe bad consequences you are 
> > talking about.
>
>
> Which description(s), specifically, are you referring to?

I described situation which contradicts human ethic when one is not
able to help because he agreed to what is written in non-free license.
Such situation is one of consequences of non-free distribution. I said
that people who distribute non-free instead of working on free do not 
take in account negative consequences of what they are doing.

You said that you are quite aware of the consequences. I asked you, what 
are this bad consequences which you balance against good consequences.

That is what you said:
> I think we're quite aware of the consequences, and that each of us
> balances the good consequences against the bad consequences.

Can you please describe this bad consequences? Are they same which I 
describe?
--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov