Re: GR: Editorial amendments to the social contract

To: Debian Vote List <debian-vote@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: GR: Editorial amendments to the social contract
From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:24:17 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] C9763941-4C4F-11D8-92BD-00039317863E@suespammers.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040120213501.GB1673@tennyson.netexpress.net>
References: <[🔎] 20040120154939.GA19911@suffields.me.uk> <[🔎] 20040120213501.GB1673@tennyson.netexpress.net>


On Jan 20, 2004, at 16:35, Steve Langasek wrote:


Nitpick: on-line, not online

dictionary.com says both are acceptable.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GR: Editorial amendments to the social contract
  - From: Scott James Remnant <scott@netsplit.com>

References:
- GR: Editorial amendments to the social contract
  - From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: GR: Editorial amendments to the social contract
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>

Prev by Date: Re: thoughts on potential outcomes for non-free ballot
Next by Date: Re: non-free and users?
Previous by thread: Re: GR: Editorial amendments to the social contract
Next by thread: Re: GR: Editorial amendments to the social contract
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread