Re: non-free and users?
Raul Miller wrote:
The mistake is acting to preclude some free distribution, support and
use of software.
How do they preclude free distribution? By distributing non-free? Or by
not distributing free instead of non-free?
I think you're talking about fairness, not ethics. You seem more
concerned with the universality of our decisions than the result of
I am concerned with the result of Debian decisions as well as with how
they will be realized.
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov