Re: non-free and users?

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: non-free and users?
From: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 14:13:53 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] bue09r$k28$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040118053105.L23413@links.magenta.com>
References: <[🔎] 20040117163045.J23413@links.magenta.com> <[🔎] 050c22a37b288bf8d29fe3fb7875d623@bouncing.localnet> <[🔎] 20040118053105.L23413@links.magenta.com>

Raul Miller wrote:

So, when I'm talking about "prevent distribution of", I'm talking
about "prevent distribution of non-free", not "prevent distribution
of upstream".

Dropping non-free (and associated SC clause) will mean preventing Debiandevelopers from acting non-ethical. If I don't have Windows XP, it willbe ethical to reject a request to distribute it, since I do not have it.

--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: non-free and users?
  - From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>

References:
- Re: non-free and users?
  - From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>
- Re: non-free and users?
  - From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
- Re: non-free and users?
  - From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: GR: Removal of non-free (with explanation)
Next by Date: Re: non-free and users?
Previous by thread: Re: non-free and users?
Next by thread: Re: non-free and users?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread