[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: non-free and users?

Raul Miller wrote:
So, when I'm talking about "prevent distribution of", I'm talking
about "prevent distribution of non-free", not "prevent distribution
of upstream".

Dropping non-free (and associated SC clause) will mean preventing Debian developers from acting non-ethical. If I don't have Windows XP, it will be ethical to reject a request to distribute it, since I do not have it.
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

Reply to: