On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 08:39, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 02:13:53PM +0100, Sergey V. Spiridonov wrote:
> > Dropping non-free (and associated SC clause) will mean preventing Debian
> > developers from acting non-ethical. If I don't have Windows XP, it will
> > be ethical to reject a request to distribute it, since I do not have it.
>
> Dropping non-free will have no affect, one way or the other, on Debian
> distributing Windows XP.
I think he used XP as an example. Substitute in "X" if you prefer:
If I don't have X, it will be ethical to reject a request to
distribute X, since I do not have X.
HTH.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part