[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: non-free and users?

On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:42:27AM +0100, Sergey V. Spiridonov wrote:
> Yes, but if we reject to distribute non-free because we are busy with 
> creating a free replacement or with working on/packaging of other free 
> software we are acting in very ethical way without necessity to compel 
> ourselves to actions which lead to described non-ethical situation.

I think that should be a per-developer decision, not something for the
social contract.


Reply to: