Re: non-free and users?
Remi Vanicat wrote:
If doing nothing is neutral, then doing nothing when someone needs help
Yes, I have to agree with you: doing nothing when someone needs help
and I am able to help is non-ethical.
So if we don't package and distribute non-free package, we act in a
non-ethical way, as we are able to do it, and there is people who find
Yes, but if we reject to distribute non-free because we are busy with
creating a free replacement or with working on/packaging of other free
software we are acting in very ethical way without necessity to compel
ourselves to actions which lead to described non-ethical situation.
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov