On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 05:16:48PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 06:09:31PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > If it happens, and you don't like it, you can blame yourself for not making > > > what you want clear before passing the GR. *shrug* > > There is nothing that can be done before passing the GR that will > > affect this. Decisions that are not part of the resolution have no > > force, and a GR can't make technical decisions. > > Sure they can -- General Resolutions are the mechanism of last resort for > deciding what happens in Debian. No. That is divided between GRs and the technical committee, and this falls squarely under the purview of tech-ctte. > If you're feeling pedantic, consider it > to be falling under the clause that allows the developer body to override > any decision made by any delegate. There's nothing that requires the > decision to have already been made before it's trumped by the developers. I don't believe that is an accurate reading of the constitution. It carefully evades permitting GRs on technical policy, instead giving that problem to tech-ctte (and the reasons for that are fairly obvious). I don't think that trying to find exploitable loopholes in the wording is a good idea. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature