Re: summary of software licenses in non-free
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 01:27:09AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 02:39:38PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > there for non-free packages. I.e., how many maintainers would be affected
> > by the migration to another service, WRT package maintanence.
> But most importantly, to me:
> 4. It's a major PITA for our users.
To me, too. That's why I think we should resolve that issue, to make it
at most a minor annoyance.