On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 03:51:01PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 03:24:20PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > That you appear not to have found any of them persuasive means neither > > that they weren't offered, nor that no one else found them compelling. > > Actually, John Goerzen pointed out some of his to me. > > However, his rationale seems to call for a bit stricter change than what > Andrew proposed. [With John's rationale, we shouldn't be supporting > non-free.] > > Or maybe you're claiming that some rationale was presented which is just > right for Andrew's most recent proposal? Which rationales are "just right" for a given proposal is a determination that has to be made by the individual. Goldilocks was a little girl, not a collective consciousness. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | // // // / / branden@debian.org | EI 'AANIIGOO 'AHOOT'E http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature