On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 04:48:49PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 11:29:57AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > > So far, the proposals have gotten as far as "Deals with a problem". > > > [In the sense that we have a conflict of opinion between people who > > > think non-free is a thing we should support and people who think that > > > non-free is not a thing we should support]. > > > > > > But where's the rest of it? > > On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 07:34:17PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > Why does there need to be anything else? > > I'm looking, perhaps in vain, for some rationale behind what you've > been proposing. Many have been offered over the past three and a half years. That you appear not to have found any of them persuasive means neither that they weren't offered, nor that no one else found them compelling. -- G. Branden Robinson | Intellectual property is neither Debian GNU/Linux | intellectual nor property. branden@debian.org | Discuss. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Linda Richman
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature