Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 03:24:20PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> That you appear not to have found any of them persuasive means neither
> that they weren't offered, nor that no one else found them compelling.
Actually, John Goerzen pointed out some of his to me.
However, his rationale seems to call for a bit stricter change than what
Andrew proposed. [With John's rationale, we shouldn't be supporting
non-free.]
Or maybe you're claiming that some rationale was presented which is just
right for Andrew's most recent proposal?
--
Raul
Reply to: