[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying



On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 12:48:32PM +0200, Guido Trotter wrote:
> If we are sure that if 2*quorum people cast a vote there is no problem with
> the proposed system, why not add to the current proposal the fact that the
> votes cast, altogether, have to be at least 2*quorum? 

Because that would have the same bad-incentives that global quorums have:
they discourage you from voting sincerely, because that might have the
effect of helping an option you're firmly against win.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- 
        you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''

Attachment: pgpsXrrGUY5Qu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: