Re: Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 02:45:30PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> And, as I've already posted elsewhere, you'll note there's no problem
> at all here if number of votes received is twice the quorum, which,
> historically, it almost always is.
I haven't had time to follow all the long discussion, so maybe I'm saying
something which isn't correct, but:
If we are sure that if 2*quorum people cast a vote there is no problem with
the proposed system, why not add to the current proposal the fact that the
votes cast, altogether, have to be at least 2*quorum? This will also ensure
that, before taking a vote into consideration, there is enough general
intrest about the issue...