Re: Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying
On Fri, 2003-05-23 at 00:45, Anthony Towns wrote:
> And, as I've already posted elsewhere, you'll note there's no problem
> at all here if number of votes received is twice the quorum, which,
> historically, it almost always is.
Not almost. Always. Quorum was calculated wrong in the old elections.
>From the logo swap election page,
With 509 developers,; Q=22.56 making a quorum of 68
However, Q should of been ~11.28; someone forgot to divide by two.
I think we should really note this on the page. I've pointed this out
before, btw; see