[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying

On Fri, 2003-05-23 at 00:45, Anthony Towns wrote:

> And, as I've already posted elsewhere, you'll note there's no problem
> at all here if number of votes received is twice the quorum, which,
> historically, it almost always is.

Not almost. Always. Quorum was calculated wrong in the old elections.
>From the logo swap election page,

	With 509 developers,; Q=22.56 making a quorum of 68

However, Q should of been ~11.28; someone forgot to divide by two. 

I think we should really note this on the page. I've pointed this out
before, btw; see 

Reply to: