Re: Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying

["John H. Robinson, IV" <jaqque@debian.org>]

Buddha Buck wrote:
> >
> >another example: DPL election, two candidates, R=45
> >
> >450x DAB
> >45x ADB
> >
> >Condorcet: D wins
> >Proposed:  A wins
> >Amended:   D wins
> 
> You are going to have to walk me though this one.  Here's what I see 
> happening under Manoj's proposal:
> 
> 45 voters prefer A to D, which is equal to R, so A "meets quorum".
> No voters prefer B to D, which is less than R, so B does not meet 
> quorum, and is eliminated.
> 
> More voters prefer D over A than A over D, so A is eliminated as not 
> acceptable.
> 
> The only remaining candidate to feed into the SSD procedure is D, so D wins.
> 
> How do you get A winning?

of course, Buddha is correct. i ran the scripts wrong. user error.

-john