Re: Signature not working
On Fri 31 Jul 2020 at 16:07:29 (+0100), Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:00:03 +0300 Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> wrote:
>
> >I agree. But it's a valid part of a e-mail body, and any MUA that
> >mishandles that is broken in this regard.
>
> I can read everything fine. Nothing gets trashed, but things that one
> expects to happen (non quoting of text after a valid sig separator)
> because Tomas has DELIBERATELY, broken his, don't occur. When asked to
> correct the problem, Tomas' answer boiled down to "No".
I'm not really sure what the implications are of Reco's post about
kmail's alleged bug. But surely, if kmail has a bug, then isn't the
correct path to report it?
> The Wanderer couched his response to that far more politely than I would
> have done.
That might be because The Wanderer was responding to some information
in Reco's post. It was much more informative than "It doesn't work."
> Since Tomas refuses to play nice, I've dealt with the issue in my own
> way.
I like to clean out all the salutations and valedictions from material
I quote, so a one-line signature like -- t's is more helpful to me than
long rambling signatures. (It sometimes transpires that people don't
even stand by the quotations their own signatures contain.)
Cheers,
David.
Reply to: