Le quintidi 25 messidor, an CCXXIV, Stefan Monnier a écrit : > FWIW, I also find it disappointing that I can't do it in an etc file of > some sort. Yes, such an essential option should be integral to the system, not brought by an obscure package. That the package exists is still better than nothing, though. > E.g. I often need something like this when running inside > a chroot and always have trouble finding the clean&easy way to do it > (IIUC dpkg should figure out on its own that it's running in a chroot, > but it doesn't seem to work reliably enough in my experience, or maybe > I misunderstood how "running in chroot" is expected to affect dpkg's > behavior by default). If both the outer and the inner systems use systemd, then you can use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. It will isolate a little more at the kernel level (using namespaces) and mount the essential pseudo-filesystems, and more importantly it starts a sub-instance of systemd that isolate the services. Regards, -- Nicolas George
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature