Re: Mailing lists, CC, followup-to, netiquette and all the rest [was: direct ethernet connection between computer and printer]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 08:10:56PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 18 October 2015 19:55:58 Brian wrote:
> > On Sun 18 Oct 2015 at 17:44:55 +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 04:55:10PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
[...]
> tomas said:
> Yes, you are right about the CoC part. Still, if someone is picky about *not*
> being cc'ed, I'd consider it polite to at least do his/her part and express
> this wish with the headers in use for this purpose. At least *before* scolding
> others <:*)
>
> Well, I am picky about not being cc'ed. I have tried to be polite. I have
> asked tomas, who thinks I should do something in my headers, how to do it.
> He tells me I can't. So now I feel free to "scold others".
Well, be fair :-) I said you can in most of the cases.
> The CoC says not to send cc's unless specifically requested. It is not a lot
> to ask that people should follow the CoC. And I shall start following the
> CoC and complaining, off list, every time, to everyone who cc's me. Perhaps
> then they will stop this pain of a practice.
>
> It is perfectly reasonable that people should be asked to do one of three
> things:
> 1) subscribe
> or
> 2) read the archives
> or
> 3) request a copy.
Don't take me wrong. I think its reasonable. But I think also we should try
to be gentle about it (and try to "fix" as much as possible on our sides).
That's all.
Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlYj8U0ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kaY+QCfbQKkq5Id5FpKRTrqtEmHfDTq
yoYAnAhMGs4Z+UiAfsz9sK4X2N1Ls2Zr
=rY1A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: