Re: question about systemd
On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 20:03:18 +0100
Martin Read <zen75502@zen.co.uk> wrote:
> On 11/10/14 19:00, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > This is the question I have, what are the stated boundaries of the
> > systemd project? Have any boundaries/goals been stated in terms of
> > when systemd will be feature complete? What is the stated
> > compliance to POSIX (Google doesn't seem to provide me good
> > results)?
>
> In respect of the first two questions: I am not aware of any such
> firm statements having been made.
>
> In respect of your third question: Contrary to the implicit
> expectation that seems to be attached to this question, POSIX.1-2008
> appears to have very little to say about how any of the things
> systemd does are supposed to work.
I think the source of most POSIX questions re systemd is the fact that
Poettering has publically stated POSIX should be ignored under certain
circumstances, and I mean a lot more circumstances than any Linux
implementation currently ignores it.
SteveT
Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance
Reply to: