Re: Let's have a vote!
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 03:05:14PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Stephen Allen wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:27:54AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> >>Martin Read wrote:
> >>>On 25/09/14 15:42, Rob Owens wrote:
> >>>>I agree that "let's wait until we have a good init to move to" should
> >>>>have been more seriously considered, but for some reason people were in
> >>>>a big hurry to make a move.
> >>>The vote held was "What should the default init system *in jessie* be?".
> >>>Given that as the question under discussion, "let's wait until we have a
> >>>good init to move to" (implication: there are currently no available init
> >>>systems better than the status quo) was perfectly well served by the
> >>>ballot option "sysvinit".
> >>>
> >>>
> >>To any developers who may be here:
> >>- At one point there was serious talk about a general resolution to overturn
> >>the systemd decision.
> >>- As I understand it, a general resolution can be called by any developer -
> >>while overturning a technical committee decision takes a 2:1 vote of
> >>developers
> >>
> >>Is there not one developer who is willing to propose such a general
> >>resolution?
> >>
> >>Miles Fidelman
> >As has been stated many times here - A GR was tried but not enough
> >seconds to carry on.
>
> Actually, no - I've been following this, and related threads, from the
> beginning - I have not seen anybody actually mention that a GR was tried.
> Do you have a reference?
Not offhand - Sorry I'm not doing your research. Put some of your wasted
energy into it.
Reply to: