Re: ANDROID
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:05:49 +0400
Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 07:21:26PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > GNU are free to express their option about 'freeness' of Debian.
> > > GNU are free to make their distribution based on Debian suited to their
> >
> > Okay, and I am free to express my opinion about FSF's stance on
> > freeness and Debian.
> >
> > > taste.
> > > Note, that GNU approach to the software worked for 30 years, and did so
> > > successfully.
> >
> > I freely concede that I owe the GNU / FSF a great debt.
>
> Sure, you do.
Not sure if this is sarcasm.
> > > Debian project is free to express their option about GNU.
> > > Debian project may take GNU position into a consideration (removal of
> > > firmware blobs from Linux kernel is a fine example of that), or ignore
> > > it (invariants in GNU documentation are non-compliant with DFSG).
> > > Note, that Debian approach to the software worked for 20 years, and did
> > > so successfully.
> > >
> > > Debian uses GNU software, GNU uses Debian as a base for one of their
> > > Linux distribution and a primary development platform for GNU/Hurd. Both
> > > are more or less happy with this situation.
> > >
> > > You, for some strange reason - is not.
> >
> > FSF is clearly not happy about Debian's policies, and I am not happy
> > about their unhappiness. Not sure why you, for some strange reason, are
> > unhappy with my unhappiness.
>
> No, I'm merely curios about your unhappiness.
Sorry, I have nothing to add. This discussion is going nowhere.
Celejar
Reply to: