Re: Using unstable for certain packages
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:47:50AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > Personally I like the about two-year stable release schedule. It is
> > long enough
>
> I appreciate knowing that our setup will not break due to this but
> also compile and download various packages like libreoffice and
> xfce-4.10.
>
> Now I would not expect libreoffice to be packaged but xfce-4.10 had a
??
$ rmadison libreoffice
libreoffice | 1:3.3.2-2~bpo60+1 | squeeze-backports | source
libreoffice | 1:3.3.3-4~bpo60+1 | squeeze-backports | source, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64
libreoffice | 1:3.4.3-3~bpo60+1 | squeeze-backports | source
libreoffice | 1:3.5.4-7~bpo60+1 | squeeze-backports | source, sparc
libreoffice | 1:3.5.4+dfsg-3~bpo60+2 | squeeze-backports | source, amd64, armel, i386, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390
libreoffice | 1:3.5.4+dfsg-4 | wheezy | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc
libreoffice | 1:3.5.4+dfsg-4 | sid | source, mips, sparc
libreoffice | 1:3.5.4+dfsg2-1 | sid | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x
libreoffice | 1:3.6.5-1 | experimental | source, s390, s390x
libreoffice | 1:4.0.2~rc1-1 | experimental | source, powerpc
libreoffice | 1:4.0.2~rc2-2 | experimental | source, amd64, armel, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
And yes, 4.0.x will also be in wheezy-backports when it's time for that.
Using it from "unstable" is bad, because it'll also give you a loads
of libs not in wheezy which might easily end up pullling a new libc6 etc.
Regards,
Rene
Reply to: