Re: CD image doesn't exist for download?
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: CD image doesn't exist for download?
- From: Doug <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:12:11 -0400
- Message-id: <4FFF056B.email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <20120712144558.69546994@nomad>
- References: <4968825A5AC34D8D84C147B12874134D@acer2e68c49b20> <CAL36VG=xO8j3VXKbfGoO9M7+jnOxAajP-4zWJEJ3yFVSsVyxNA@mail.gmail.com> <1342025197.2311.6.camel@precise> <20120712030019.GA31943@tal> <1342064860.2311.85.camel@precise> <20120712144558.69546994@nomad>
On 07/12/2012 12:45 AM, Charlie wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 05:47:40 +0200 "Ralf Mardorf
firstname.lastname@example.org" suggested this:
There are trillions of tasks Linux can't do.
Obviously I'm one of those who doesn't need any of these, because I
usually feel the opposite, but don't use windows.
I suppose if you have a lot of money then applications written and sold
for windows can do anything as well?
Good to know anyway.
Thanks for that information.
I don't think there are trillions, but two examples are for real:
AutoCAD and WordPerfect. I know there are cad programs
for Linux, but _all_ cad programs are learning-intensive, so
if you know one, then you surely do not want to learn another.
The various descendents of StarOffice--Symphony, OO, and LO
--simply cannot equal WP, and even MS Office does not have all
of WP's capability. I'm sure there are other examples.
BTW, I'm not defending Windows--I have Win7, and I hate the
damned thing! But I use it when I must.
Blessed are the peacekeepers...for they shall be shot at from both sides. --A.M. Greeley