Re: "Gnome" package now requires installing "tracker"?
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> wrote:
> On 14.02.2012 17:04, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Given this enormous amount of dependencies, I really don’t think you
>>>>> can complain about tracker.
>>>>
>>>> More than a complaint, I'd like to know why there exists such as
>>>> requirement "now". It was not just a few weeks ago.
>>>
>>> This requirement comes from upstream.
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> Any document to support that statement?
>
> Tom is right.
> gnome-documents is in the official set of apps for GNOME 3.2 [1] and the
> gnome meta package is just following upstream here.
>
> That said, it's a meta package. If you don't like it, don't use it.
>
> [1] http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/apps/3.2/3.2.2/sources/
This link was useful, thanks. I think the following's what Camaleon's
looking for:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnome-documents/0.1/gnome-documents-0.1.92.news
has "Require Tracker 0.12.1".
Reply to: