[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is there any issue with reportbug in unstabl or bugs.debian.org?



Camaleón wrote:
> Darac Marjal wrote:
> > While a web-based interface may be nice, I think that where debian's bug
> > reporting excels is in the 'reportbug' program. It's not just a program
> > that sends emails to a single address, but it provides a good guide
> > through the bug-reporting process, namely encouraging you to check that
> > the bug is not already raised, checking that the version of the package
> > you're reporting against isn't out of date and also collecting useful
> > information for the developers (changed configuration, usually).
> 
> Did you recently fill a bug on a bugzilla-alike bug tracking system?
> 
> It does not only allows what you mention but it enhances the reporter 
> experience by allowing a higher level of configuration and customization 
> on almost any aspect, not only for the UI (bugs alerts are just great).
> 
> > Some of that, a web based solution just can't do (as easily).
> 
> Ha! Of course it can.

(shock, surprise) You are saying that filling out a web form in a
browser can run processes on the local host machine and send data to
the internet?  No it can't or it would be a severe security
vulnerability.  Please list any browser that allows this so that I can
file the appropriately severe security bugs against them.

> And bugzilla does not tend to crash when writing bug reports >:-)
>
> In fact, I usually avoid using "reportbug" because of its high 
> instability (it's annoying having to re-do a full report several 
> times...) and finally send the report "manually" -by e-mail- which is not 
> a task for newcomers neither encourages people to write bug reports ;-(

I have never ever seen reportbug crash.  Since it is just a python
script I would think that an actual crash would be quite difficult.

I am hoping you filed a bug report on reportbug crashing! :-)

Bob

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: