Re: qemu or qemu-kvm for kvm in squeeze

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: qemu or qemu-kvm for kvm in squeeze
From: Mark Allums <mark@allums.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:51:30 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 4B95B7B2.5040500@allums.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4B95B472.8000707@allums.com>
References: <[🔎] 20100304224953.GG17132@finrod> <[🔎] 4B90534A.2020408@allums.com> <[🔎] 4B9475F3.8020600@allums.com> <[🔎] 20100308124152.GB20080@finrod> <[🔎] 4B95348A.5020903@allums.com> <[🔎] 20100308210824.GA3452@finrod> <[🔎] 4B958935.70709@stammed.net> <[🔎] 4B95B472.8000707@allums.com>

On 3/8/2010 8:37 PM, Mark Allums wrote:

 Are you saying that one package is simply a meta- or virtual
package pointing to the other, and that installing one installs the other?

Because I just tried that (in Squeeze), and the two are mutuallyexclusive. You can install one or the other, but not both, And theversioning numbers bear no resemblance (not that they should).


MAA

(Need more sleep)

Reply to:

References:
- qemu or qemu-kvm for kvm in squeeze
  - From: Martin Kraus <lists_mk@wujiman.net>
- Re: qemu or qemu-kvm for kvm in squeeze
  - From: Mark Allums <mark@allums.com>
- Re: qemu or qemu-kvm for kvm in squeeze
  - From: Mark Allums <mark@allums.com>
- Re: qemu or qemu-kvm for kvm in squeeze
  - From: Martin Kraus <lists_mk@wujiman.net>
- Re: qemu or qemu-kvm for kvm in squeeze
  - From: Mark Allums <mark@allums.com>
- Re: qemu or qemu-kvm for kvm in squeeze
  - From: Martin Kraus <lists_mk@wujiman.net>
- Re: qemu or qemu-kvm for kvm in squeeze
  - From: thib <thib@stammed.net>
- Re: qemu or qemu-kvm for kvm in squeeze
  - From: Mark Allums <mark@allums.com>

Prev by Date: Re: qemu or qemu-kvm for kvm in squeeze
Next by Date: Re: KDE and Squeeze
Previous by thread: Re: qemu or qemu-kvm for kvm in squeeze
Next by thread: Re: qemu or qemu-kvm for kvm in squeeze
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread