On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 08:54:56AM +0300, Tapani Tarvainen wrote: > On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 03:20:38PM +1000, Alex Samad (alex@samad.com.au) wrote: > > > i think you have just proven my point, its not a simple process > > Of course. As I wrote earlier: > > > > > > recovery of a partially lost lv is rather painful. > > Although if the file -> pv mapping was commonly needed, it > wouldn't be too hard to write a script to do it. > Or the reverse, determining which files were on the lost pv. > I guess there hasn't been much need since nobody's bothered > to do that yet. > > But I have yet to see any convincing information about how > much better Windows Home Server is in a similar situation. Please don't assume I am saying M$ software is better. > What I have seen is news headings like > "Windows Home Server Bug Could Lead To Data Loss" and > "Shared Folders Problem While Removing Physically Failed Hard > Drive in Windows Home Server". > > If someone has actual experience about dealing with lost > disk in WHS, please tell us. > -- HP had a unique policy of allowing its engineers to take parts from stock as long as they built something. "They figured that with every design, they were getting a better engineer. It's a policy I urge all companies to adopt." -- Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, "Will Wozniak's class give Apple to teacher?" EE Times, June 6, 1988, pg 45
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature