Hallo Moritz,
Am 2008-05-02 13:50:30, schrieb hh.eu@gmx.de:
> I've been seeing different comments on this list recently regarding
> mixing
> stable with testing or unstable or backports etc. Generally this
> should be
> avoided. Would this mean, since I need a newer kernel than the one in
> etch
> stable, that I should not run Etch stable but go for lenny or sid
> instead?
I suggest you to ONLY compile your own 2.6.25 Kernel with all needed
modules included which will give you a perfect Kernel without initrd and
dependence hell... (initrd-tools and such from Etch are not compatibel
with the stuff from Kernel 2.6.25)
> As for the RAID: I plan to use software RAID rather than use 'hardware'
> RAID of the controller. That should be possible, shouldn't it?
Yes. And of course, even if the mainboard would support Hardware
Raid-1/2 I will never trust them... For such things I would use a 3Ware
where I can be sure, I get a compatibel one if something goeas wrong.
Note: I am using a VIA EPIA LN10000EAG with 1 GByte memory and a
4 GByte "SanDisk Extreme IV" and I am very happy with it.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
+49/177/9351947 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
+33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
Attachment:
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature