Am 2008-05-04 12:36:10, schrieb Paul Johnson:
> On Saturday 03 May 2008 11:38:59 pm NN_il_Confusionario wrote:
> > On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > On Saturday 03 May 2008 02:17:30 am LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > > > Currently, I'm thinking of Samba,
> > > > because the win clients can only use that; is this correct?
> > >
> > > Why not use something real on the clients?
> >
> > What does it mean "something real" ?
>
> Why not use something other than Windows on the clients?
Because some enterprise NEED propretary software which do not exist
under Linux? And they even can not update to "Micro$oft Winsuck Fiasco
Ultimate"(tm) since new licenses cost over 5000 Euro per workplace?
(happen here in Strasbourg to some Enterprises)
Where I had to install a FileServer, PostgreSQL and Webserver and on the
FileServer an DomU containing a "WInXP based proprietary database".
<SIGH>
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
+49/177/9351947 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
+33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
Attachment:
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature