Am 2008-05-04 12:36:10, schrieb Paul Johnson: > On Saturday 03 May 2008 11:38:59 pm NN_il_Confusionario wrote: > > On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > On Saturday 03 May 2008 02:17:30 am LÉVAI Dániel wrote: > > > > Currently, I'm thinking of Samba, > > > > because the win clients can only use that; is this correct? > > > > > > Why not use something real on the clients? > > > > What does it mean "something real" ? > > Why not use something other than Windows on the clients? Because some enterprise NEED propretary software which do not exist under Linux? And they even can not update to "Micro$oft Winsuck Fiasco Ultimate"(tm) since new licenses cost over 5000 Euro per workplace? (happen here in Strasbourg to some Enterprises) Where I had to install a FileServer, PostgreSQL and Webserver and on the FileServer an DomU containing a "WInXP based proprietary database". <SIGH> Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator 24V Electronic Engineer Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ##################### Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 +49/177/9351947 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi +33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
Attachment:
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature