Re: What am I missing without mutt?
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:30:21 +0100, Steve Lamb wrote:
> John Hasler wrote:
>> s. keeling writes:
>>> Mutt handles any standard form of mail box format, including
>>> on_some_other_server(don't much care how), aka. imap.
>> Internet Message Access Protocol is a protocol, not a file format.
> Not to mention mutt's IMAP implementation is less than stellar. I
> certainly wouldn't go around crowing about it.
huh? it works decently enough & as well as some of the alternatives.
Stephen Patterson :: email@example.com :: http://patter.mine.nu/
GPG: B416F0DE :: Jabber: firstname.lastname@example.org
"Don't be silly, Minnie. Who'd be walking round these cliffs with a gas oven?"