Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
From: galevsky@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:35:07 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 5d4c1ca80704020235k35fc0d32o74f7c29dc5bde92b@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070402083716.GG4593@fantomas.sk>
References: <20070330203038.GA14247@fantomas.sk> <MHEGIFHMACFNNIMMBACAEEOAOOAA.sethg@goodmanassociates.com> <20070331110259.GA20760@fantomas.sk> <[🔎] slrnf0vacd.11r.news@terminus.bobcox.net> <[🔎] 20070401142415.33acd881@abydos.stargate.org.uk> <[🔎] 5d4c1ca80704011201o1051d118waaa43eae03b5884b@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 46101A17.10504@cox.net> <[🔎] 5d4c1ca80704011430m1f3a5eb9u129745bacca8e4c1@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20070402010926.5cc82256@think.homenet> <[🔎] 20070402083716.GG4593@fantomas.sk>

2007/4/2, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@fantomas.sk>:


Gal:
Just ask google to implement the list-reply button, it would no harm to you
or them.


I will ;)

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
  - From: Bob Cox <news@bobcox.com>
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
  - From: Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk>
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
  - From: nicolas.flinois@gmail.com
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
  - From: galevsky@gmail.com
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
  - From: Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
  - From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@fantomas.sk>

Prev by Date: Re: Desktop user: Etch or the next testing?
Next by Date: Re: Desktop user: Etch or the next testing?
Previous by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
Next by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread