Re: OT: Choice of OOo and LaTeX
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Your suggestion, no. Johannes' constant harping, yes. Especially when he
> starts engaging in strawman fallacies, ignoring things I am saying and
> flipping arguments my mixing unrelated things together.
Sorry again, I never intended intended to 'harp'. Others and myself were
just proposing alternative ways to your goal 'Tool for document
management'. You were starting to be picky and claiming this and that
requirement is not met by Latex, I have to use OOo. Your false
presumptions about the flexibility of latex triggered me trying to
clarify those issues that you got wrong.
If there is a problem than this: you don't just take the advice, you
claim that the advice is *unsuitable* to your problem, which it is not.
You are perfectly free to ignore advice that you personally don't want
to use, but instead you constantly claim that the advice is wrong.
Peace! In a free world everyone may use the tool he/she is comfortable
with.
Johannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG+pZSC1NzPRl9qEURAtYZAJ9+rYIiRyn+xkLWq7Y+FV2YrjoG6wCffdgk
RMIgADrvLcaXLOFWEaffaic=
=SVJq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: