Re: My complaints to Murphy about sex spam on the list are being rejected
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun Sep 09, 2007 at 14:33:08 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 05:26:56PM -0400, KS wrote:
>>> No. That was a statement in addition to my earlier post asking if an
>>> email client can also "report spam" just as we can do via the web
>>> interface manually. If it was possible, my client (and possibly several
>>> others) could have already updated murphy about those spam messages.
>> have your client move the spam mail to a folder and have a script
>> watch for new files, bounce them to reportspam at murphy and then
>> delete the mail.
>>
>> Probably that's a bad idea though as if you make a mistake, or your
>> local filters get poisoned, you'll be automatically poisoning murphy.
>
> no. we feed the mails send to reportspam to the db manualy, so that
> can't happen.
>
> Greetings
> Martin
>
>
In that case, I might as well keep reporting spam manually via the web
archive. The number of spam messages which come in is quite small and
that way I won't be adding more work for the reportspam db maintainers.
Regards,
/KS
Reply to: