Re: My complaints to Murphy about sex spam on the list are being rejected
KS wrote:
> Nigel Henry wrote:
>> On Sunday 09 September 2007 20:57, Nigel Henry wrote:
>>> I've just complained twice about s-x spam that's turning up on the list,
>>> and neither of my posts are to be seen anywhere. Murphy seems to be
>>> moderating complaints from legitimate users of the list, but allowing
>>> "spa--ers" to do what they like.
>>>
>>> I've had a few drinks, but am especially pi--ed off with p--is enlargement
>>> spam on this list. Come on guys. Get your sh-t together, and get rid of the
>>> "spa--ers".
>>>
>>> And I'm going to keep on sending complaints, until something positive is
>>> done.
>>>
>>> I like this list, but am not in any way interested in a pe-is enlargement.
>>> I'm 59 years old, nothing works anymore, and the people that are posting
>>> this stuff to the list are the ultimate scum of the planet. Give me a
>>> shotgun, and I'll take them out.
>>>
>>> Nigel. Seriously pished off.
>> It's amazing that this has turned up on the list, and I've had to edit many
>> words even to send it, and yet my complaints to Murphy about the sex spam
>> that's plaguing the list still havn't arrived.
>>
>> While I'm writing this another sex spam has arrived in my Debian-user mailbox.
>>
>> A serious question. How can the spa--ers post to the list, using any words
>> they like, and yet when I complain to the list using the same words they do,
>> I am blocked from posting???
>>
>> Nigel.
>>
>>
>
> The only way I know to report spam is to click the "Report Spam" button
> on the web interface for list archives. Can that be done via
> Iceweasel(or other mail clients) interface so that users don't have to
> go and find that particular email archive in the browser?
>
> /KS
BTW, all those spam messages were detected as spam by Iceweasel and
moved to the Junk folder automatically. But that does not communicate
with the spam filters for d-u and is local only.
/KS
Reply to: