Re: Is Etch Stable is really stable?

To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Is Etch Stable is really stable?
From: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:43:17 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 007501c7a24b$229908d0$0201a8c0@wa9als>
References: <[🔎] e46817700705282036y4832f69ax537d77472a134147@mail.gmail.com><[🔎] 20070529060531.GB14495@think.homenet><[🔎] e46817700705291257h3d0a24bfm2f3c08b2e4e25f15@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20070529150632.nry9say2skgs0wsw@portal.wiredbyte.com>

----- Original Message -----From: "Michael Conway" <mike.conway@wiredbyte.com>

To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: Is Etch Stable is really stable?

From what I have read in the Etch Install notes, it is actually

recomended that Etch be clean-installed and not dist-upgraded from
sarge due to issues being reported in this process. Maybe things have
changed though.

Oh I hope that's not true or needs qualification. That would negate a primebeauty of Debian - the seamless upgrade process!


John

Reply to:

References:
- Is Etch Stable is really stable?
  - From: "Deboo ^" <knowledgeful@gmail.com>
- Re: Is Etch Stable is really stable?
  - From: andreimpopescu@gmail.com (Andrei Popescu)
- Re: Is Etch Stable is really stable?
  - From: "Deboo ^" <knowledgeful@gmail.com>
- Re: Is Etch Stable is really stable?
  - From: Michael Conway <mike.conway@wiredbyte.com>

Prev by Date: Re: powersave error.
Next by Date: Re: SCSI - SATA device name conflict
Previous by thread: Re: Is Etch Stable is really stable?
Next by thread: Re: Is Etch Stable is really stable?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread