Re: OT: sponge burning!
..reposting, last try was lost in gmane's auth queue.
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:05:38 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote in
[🔎] 20070319230538.GH31767@santiago.connexer.com:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 06:09:48PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>>
>> ..maybe, define "just full of all sorts of conspiracy theories", I
>> don't watch TV, I pick my news off the web, where I try to balance
>> Muslim, Crusader, Commie, Jew, Asian, LatinAmerican and Norwegian news
>> against what I learned in boot school.
>>
> Oh yeah, labeling non-muslims as crusaders is really balanced.
..maybe you should try my way yourself, or am I missing some dense irony
here? ;o)
>> > Again, your naivete is scary. The Muslims will not be happy until
>> > the Jews and Christians are gone. Don't you get it? We can't just
>> > "go home" and think that they will never bother us again. To think
>> > so is beyond naive.
>>
>> ..so, "we'll just wipe'm out, right?" "Genau wie im Auschwitz?"
>>
> Yeah. Because you know that the US military is over in Iraq and
> Afghanistan rounding up innocent women and children and killing them by
> the truckload in the name of stopping terrorism. Oh wait, that's not at
> all what is happening. They are over there looking for the actual
> terrorists and their supporters. They are capturing the terrorists and
> affording them Geneva conventions protections (of which you are so fond
> of claiming that should be done) whem *they are not even entitled* to
> such protection.
..here, you qualify yourself as a war criminal if you wanna pretend this
is legal.
..read Article 5 of the NATO treaty, then the 4 Geneva Conventions and
their 3 Protocols Additional and then the US War Crimes Act as it were on
9/11 2001, to understand the lawful legal regime for this war.
..then enforce them all, or become a war criminal, or "Step aside!" as
Osama said.
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
Reply to: