Re: OT: sponge burning!
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:46:20 -0700, Andrew wrote in message
<[🔎] 20070316174620.GD3712@localhost.localdomain>:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:25:24PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 10:05:19AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:57:43PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 06:08:24AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > > > > Clive Menzies wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Bringing democracy and freedom to the Iraqi people .... er
> > > > > > no!
> > > > >
> > > > > Uh, yes. Try looking past Wolf Blitzer and his over-hyped
> > > > > candy show and try to find the good in the nation. You do
> > > > > realize that 80-90% of the the violence in Iraq right now is
> > > > > in a 20 mile radius of Bagdad?
> > > >
> > > > *And* is caused by a small and determined group of violent
> > > > religious extremists.
> > > >
> > >
> > > which group is that?
> > >
> > That would be the militias who are sending people into crowded
> > public places to blow themselves up. You see, they have not the
> > courage to attack the coalition forces directly. They lay IEDs by
> > the side of the road, but this rarely results in more than the
> > deaths of one or two soldiers. So, they go into markets and blow up
> > 100 innocent civilians instead. <sarcasm> Oh yes, these are true
> > freedom fighters! </sarcasm>
>
> ah. okay. so not one group, but many groups. I was afraid you were
> going to come back blaming one group alone.
..like one of either Blackwater, Halliburton or KBR?
Or some bunches of top secret tiny wee teams of "PMC"'s? ;o)
These bombs _are_ _very_ good for their business.
And, how _would_ we D-U'pes know? From Fox? ;o)
..consider asking any GI Iraq veteran how long he'd last if their
"water supply contractors" turns on them to try evade Article 47
enforcement, and you will find the Bush Regime is using these
mercenaries to hold the US Army, USAF, USMC, hostage in Iraq.
..if mercenaries could legally fight for profit, and were forced by law
to carry the burden of proof they commit no war crimes, they could
legally sell combat footage to both Fox, CNN and al-Jazeera, and
_that_ would actually help promote the rule of law and order and
democracy in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
..today, mercenaries face this regime:
http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/b0d5f4c1f4b8102041256739003e6366/9edc5096d2c036e9c12563cd0051dc30?OpenDocument
http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/COM/470-750057?OpenDocument
..any Muslim can see with their own eyes who fights this war under
Sharia, a few Muslims also know the 4 Geneva Conventions good
enough to compare and tell "whether or not the crusaders follows
their own laws."
..I was trained for WWIII, nuclear combat against the Soviet Union
under the full 4 Geneva Conventions, and how to use these Conventions
as a psyops weapon against the Soviet GI's. Even the Nazis made
some use of these. But the Bush Regime has declared them, "old
fashion" and "obsolete." That is precisely why I, as a civilian, am
_pleased_ to honor Osama bin Laden's 3'rd option, "Step aside!",
where Sissy Boy George screams "With me, or, against me!".
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
Reply to: