[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Browser identification to websites



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 14:38 +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
>>> After all the claims that Iceweasel=Firefox with just a name change.
>>> I never had those problems with Firefox.
> [...]
>> After all the problems I have been having with IceWeasel, I have started
>> using Konqeror more and more.  Unfortunately, some web sites don't work
>> so well with it.  Then again, some don't work for anything but IE.
>>
>> I just saw that Mozilla just released 2.0.0.3 for a security patch.  I
>> wonder how long before we'll get Iceweasel 2.0.0.3?
>>
>> Hopefully the transition is complete enough that we won't run into
>> things like losing our profiles or having 2 tabs open when we click on
>> something.  These issues are fixed in iceweasel_2.0.0.2+dfsg-3; I'm
>> curious as to what iceweasel_2.0.0.3+dfsg-1 will bring us.
> 
> I would guess those were problems related to the switch from Firefox 1.5
> to 2.0 and general packaging issues in Debian, nothing related to the
> name change.
> 
> If one is running testing/unstable, bugs should be expected. Reading
> changelogs, scanning the bts and filing bug reports also.
> 

Yes, it was Etch/Sid that had the issue and no, it wasn't the 1.5 to 2.0
transition.

You're right about expecting bugs.  I'm not complaining about having a
little bug here or there.  You're right that it is to be expected,
that's why is isn't Stable.

What I don't like is bugs being created to fix bugs that aren't there.
I suppose that's the risk I take for running up to date software rather
than old software, too bad I can't get "stable new software".  I suppose
that is an oxymoron in the Debian world.

Oh, now I am criticizing Debian.  Shame on me.

I take it back.  There were no problems, only hiccups.  The problem is
not with the software, it's with the web and the webmasters that don't
author compliant pages.

Joe

- --
Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGAUuqiXBCVWpc5J4RAks1AJ9PxIe6+hCFDy6sqcC5Lz4tmZRDCgCgnFja
ItzpHIHlscG5DaduG2vnCdA=
=iRQc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: