Re: Browser identification to websites
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Wayne Topa wrote:
> Joe Hart(firstname.lastname@example.org) is reported to have said:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
> <<snip>> Hint Joe
>> It is interesting though. It seems that the change from Firefox to
>> Iceweasel caused a lot more problems than some people think.
> By that do you mean I am not the only one that finds that urlview
> doesn't work in Iceweasel, Iceweasel randomly crashes while loading
> After all the claims that Iceweasel=Firefox with just a name change.
> I never had those problems with Firefox.
> Then again this testing partition seems to be doing a lot of strange
> things that I can't find bug reports on. Maybe I just need a clean
> install on it. On a 2.4k dialup that does not make me feel warm and
I think we've been through the whole iceweasel == || != firefox issue
before. I understand the reasoning behind the name change, and I
understand both sides of the issue. What I don't understand is why it
has to have such a large impact on us, the users.
After all the problems I have been having with IceWeasel, I have started
using Konqeror more and more. Unfortunately, some web sites don't work
so well with it. Then again, some don't work for anything but IE.
I just saw that Mozilla just released 22.214.171.124 for a security patch. I
wonder how long before we'll get Iceweasel 126.96.36.199?
Hopefully the transition is complete enough that we won't run into
things like losing our profiles or having 2 tabs open when we click on
something. These issues are fixed in iceweasel_188.8.131.52+dfsg-3; I'm
curious as to what iceweasel_184.108.40.206+dfsg-1 will bring us.
Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----